How putting laptops in student hands is changing education today

Brian Unruh, AEA 267 Technology Consultant

It goes without saying that technology has become part of our everyday lives. The degree to which this has happened is different for everyone, but for many of us, it has reached the point where we don’t even notice—or we simply take the technology for granted. Within education, we have also seen a trend toward moving technology into teacher and student hands (e.g. iPads, Interactive White Boards, portable labs, document cameras, virtual reality, etc.)

Around the state, some districts have adopted a one-to-one (1:1) initiative to not only move technology into teacher and student hands, but also to positively impact how teaching and learning looks moving forward. 1:1 represents a ratio of one laptop to one student. Within 1:1 schools, each student is “given” a laptop to use for the school year. Each student is able to utilize their laptop to research assignments, create projects, communicate with other students and teachers, and organize their digital worlds. Oftentimes, students take them home and use them outside of the school day to continue their learning.

Starting an initiative like this is not done without a considerable amount of planning and effort well before the computers touch the students’ hands. School district leaders have to consider district policies, insurance, network infrastructure, professional development, funding, and sustainability. Even though it is a huge undertaking, many districts around the state are doing it well, and administrators, teachers, and students are willing to share their experiences with anyone who is interested. In 2009, there were only nine districts that had a 1:1 initiative (at least one grade level) within the state. At the end of the 2011-12 school year, that number across the state will have jumped to just over 100 districts. Most of the districts that have gone 1:1 are using a laptop as the primary tool for student use, but there are also a handful of districts that have used an iPad instead of a laptop.

This past December, over 200 educators came to a 1:1 conference hosted by Area Education Agency 267. Schools from around the area came together to share their experiences in 1:1 classrooms and learn from each other. Some of the sessions were streamed live on the Internet to a wide audience of people representing 12 states, the District of Columbia and two Canadian provinces.

Adopting a 1:1 initiative within a district can eliminate the frustration of teachers and students who are not able to access technology when they need it. Seamless student access to the technology provides endless possibilities for student learning and demonstration of what they have learned. Many classrooms are connecting with experts in a variety of career fields and exposing students to cultures all over the world. The net impact is that students are gaining life skills that are hard to measure on standardized tests.

In the end, this type of quality teaching and learning doesn’t happen because of the technology, but because of supportive administrators and innovative teachers willing to create meaningful opportunities for their students to learn. The technology provides more possibilities than what was available before, but it takes quality educators to capitalize on those opportunities and create an environment where the students take more ownership in their learning. Area Education Agency 267—and all of Iowa’s AEAs—are playing a vital role in helping students and educators embrace this important new development in education.

Brian Unruh is a Technology Consultant with Area Education Agency 267, based in Cedar Falls. He can be reached at 319-273-8240. Area Education Agency 267 serves over 65,000 students. In addition, over 5,000 educators rely on AEA 267 for services in special education, school technology, media and instructional/curriculum support. The agency’s service area reaches 18 counties and nearly 9,000 square miles.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Schools and Districts “In Need of Assistance”…what’s changing…what’s working

Dr. Jon McKenzie

President Obama has recently reauthorized No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and is allowing states to apply for waivers around accountability issues. Many states, including Iowa, are taking advantage of this unique opportunity. Specifics of Iowa’s waiver are not yet finalized, but will soon be. Regardless of the recent reauthorization and ensuing waivers, it has been my experience in working with schools (designated “Schools In Need of Assistance” or SINA) and districts (designated “Districts In Need of Assistance” of DINA), that the good work that has resulted from going through the SINA/DINA process – despite some of the hoops—has had positive impacts on students, parents, teachers and administrators.

The process consists of five phases: audit, diagnosis, designing an action plan, implementation and evaluation. A large part of the evaluation phase focuses on the extent to which teachers implement the training they receive throughout the school year.  Another piece focuses on student test scores. The first piece should heavily influence the last piece. When this is the case, the chance for systemic lasting change greatly increases.  Positive, lasting systemic change is the goal of the SINA process.

These types of systemic changes positively impact student outcomes. Among other things, Iowa’s waiver will probably expand the accountability measures to include more than the percent of students scoring proficient on standardized tests. Currently however, accountability focuses mostly on the percent of students scoring proficient. But savvy educators have always known the importance of what happens before students reach school or enter the third grade. So, one component of a quality action plan is to further enhance and align the curriculum, instruction and assessment across all grades (PK-2 as well) to help build an even more solid foundation for these students as early as possible.

Savvy educators also realize that a vital component of a good quality action plan is to help concerned parents understand the importance of what happens academically to their children before they begin school and to act on that understanding. Parent involvement can be measured in part and is critical to build the strong academic foundation that is also critical for children’s future success. Parents’ consistently and purposefully reading to their children as early as possible is all that is required. Doing so will produce several positive outcomes. Some of these include increasing their vocabulary, listening skills, attention span and demonstrating the value parents place on reading and schooling to their children. Recall the old saying; “Children must first learn to read in order to read to learn.” So how can parents know if those countless readings of Good Night Moon and numerous other books have had an impact on their child’s academic success by the time they enter the third grade?

Measuring student outcomes at the third grade is really quite simple and straightforward. Further, it absolutely includes what parents do as part of this measurement.  Here is one example. Schools that are on a “watch list” (established by the federal government) for two years and fail to make the progress are designated as SINA. The data generated from the Iowa Assessments during these two years can serve as a baseline measure for future third grade classes. Comparing this baseline measurement to current third grade classes who have received SINA programs provides a means to determine differences between third graders who received these services and those that did not.

A recent comparison in one school showed that third grade students who have received these SINA services scored three-fourths of a year ahead on the Iowa Assessments when compared to the baseline scores.  Those are impressive results! But even more impressive from a systemic view is when the next group of third graders duplicates those results. When this occurs, systemic changes have been made at both the home and at the school. Congratulations are due to students, parents, teachers, and administrators for these results. So parents, be savvy and read to and encourage your children to read at home. It’s vital for their future academic success!

Dr. Jon McKenzie is the Director of Assessment and Comprehensive Improvement for Area Education Agency 267. He provides support and leadership to schools and buildings designated “in need of assistance” as part of No Child Left Behind. Jon can be reached at 319-273-8287. Area Education Agency 267 serves over 60,000 students. In addition, over 5,000 educators rely on AEA 267 for services in special education, school technology, media and instructional/curriculum support. The agency’s service area reaches 18 counties and nearly 9,000 square miles.

Posted in Focus On | Leave a comment

How to learn about AEA 267 PD cancellations and office closures due to weather

Although we are experiencing a milder than normal winter, unfortunately the threat of inclement weather is always present. AEA 267 announces professional development cancellations and office closures in the following ways:

  1. Under “Latest News” on the agency’s website.
  2. Via cell phone text message or email from https://schoolalerts.iowa.gov/, an automated web-based service. Sign up today!
  3. The official agency announcements line at 1-866-923-1089.

 

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Input from Iowans wanted at meetings about state’s No Child Left Behind waiver request

DES MOINES, IA – The Iowa Department of Education will give Iowans a chance to weigh in on a plan to request a waiver from requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act during a statewide series of public meetings from Jan. 31 to Feb. 9.Department leaders will visit all nine Area Education Agencies in Iowa, starting with AEA 267 in Cedar Falls on Jan. 31 and ending with Northwest AEA in Sioux City and Prairie Lakes AEA in Pocahontas on Feb. 9. (Click here for a complete schedule of meeting dates, times and locations.)

The Department will present details about Iowa’s waiver request and plans to develop a new accountability system that puts student achievement first but also focuses on student growth and assessments that align with the Iowa Core standards.

In September, the U.S. Department of Education invited states to apply for flexibility from specific requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act in exchange for rigorous and comprehensive state-developed plans. Iowa’s application will be submitted by Feb. 21.

States must address the following principles in their waiver applications:  College and career-ready expectations for all students; state-developed systems for differentiated recognition, accountability and support; and support for effective instruction and leadership, including new guidelines for local teacher and principal evaluation and support systems.

In a new video, Iowa Department of Education Director Jason Glass addresses the purpose of Iowa’s waiver request.

Iowans who are unable to attend the public meetings can submit comments in writing to wilma.gajdel@iowa.gov until 4 p.m. on Feb. 1.

For more information, go to www.educateiowa.gov.

 

Posted in News | Leave a comment

2011 Condition of Education report available

DES MOINES, IA – The Iowa Department of Education recently released the 2011 edition of the Annual Condition of Education report.

The report provides a wide range of state-level data, including shifts in student populations and demographics, teacher salaries and characteristics, student achievement results and school financial information.

“We strive to provide the most useful data every year and will continue to do so in the years ahead to help move education forward in Iowa,” Iowa Department of Education Director Jason Glass said.

The report includes the most recent data through the 2010-11 school year, unless otherwise noted. Read the report here <http://educateiowa.gov/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=12685&Itemid=4434> .
Highlights include:
 
Schools and Teachers

  • 507,297: The number of students enrolled in Iowa’s public and nonpublic schools. Statewide enrollment has declined by 29 percent since its peak in 1972-73 (711,000); however, projections show a 2.4 percent increase in public school enrollment in the next five years. 
  • 359: The number of Iowa school districts in 2010-11; there were 361 the year before and 431 in 1990.
  • $49,626: The average salary for public school teachers in 2009-10, up from $48,638 the previous school year. Iowa ranks 26th nationally in teacher pay and 7th among Midwestern states.
  • 96.4%: Percentage of Iowa school districts that offered preschool in 2010-11, up from 83.4 percent in 2008-09.
  • 42: Average age of Iowa’s full-time public school teachers.

 

 

Students in Public Schools

  • 18.5%: Percentage of minority student enrollment, up from 14.9 percent in 2008-09 and 5.5 percent in 1990.
  • 39%: Percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, up from 27 percent a decade ago. 
  • 88.8%: Graduation rate for the Class of 2010.
  • 39.4%: Percentage of students in Iowa’s Class of 2010 who enrolled in high-level math courses, including calculus and trigonometry.
  • 22.3: ACT composite score among 61 percent of students in Iowa’s Class of 2011 who were tested. The national average was 21.1 out of a possible 36.
  • 31%: Percentage of students in Iowa’s Class of 2011 who met all four ACT college-ready benchmarks. The benchmarks specify the minimum scores needed to show a student has a 50 percent chance of earning a grade of B or higher, or about a 75 percent chance of earning a C grade or higher.
  • 32,726: The number of students enrolled concurrently in high school and community college courses, up from 21,587 in 2006-07. 
  • 57%: The gap in reading proficiency between Iowa fourth-grade students with and without disabilities on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. In eighth-grade, the reading gap was 56 percent.

 

School Finance

  • 82%: Percentage of total general fund spending in public schools for salaries and benefits.
  • $9,455: Iowa’s average per-student expenditure in 2009-10. The amount is up from $9,203 the year before. 
  • 70.8%: Percentage of total general fund spending in Iowa public schools dedicated to student instruction in 2009-10; up from 68.6 percent in 1997-98.

 

 

Posted in News | Leave a comment